from "L'Università di Torino", Pluriverso, Torino 1993
For more information an expanded version, in italian,
of this document is available.
Vittorio Amedeo
II, Duke of
Savoy, after 1713 King of Sicily -- exchanged with Sardinia in 1720 --
conceded
a Royal Charter to the old University of Turin in 1720. The chair of
Physics
was established, at first in the Faculty of Medicine, Philosophy and
the Arts;
and then in 1737, with the reorganization of the University into four
faculties,
Physics, with the attached cabinet of instruments, belonged in the
Faculty of
Arts together with Mathematics, Philosophy and Rhetoric.
Until 1748 the teaching was
imparted first by
Father Roma and then by Father Gallo, of the worthy Minimal Order whose
members
were dedicated to the study of natural phenomena. In truth, the two
Fathers
were naturally more versed in questions of ethics than in the new
physics, and
the teaching was marked by Carthesianism rather than Galilean and
Newtonian
inspiration. This, however, is natural: we must not forget that
Fontenelle, an
important figure among the Carthesians, died centenarian in 1757; and
that the
Lettres Anglaises, in which Voltaire wittily compares the London
Newtonian
scientific milieu to the Parisian, were published in 1734.
Father Garro collected in his
physics
laboratory a certain number of experimental machines even before the
famous
visit of Abbot Nollet who, invited by the King between 1739 and 1740,
demonstrated at the Court experiments with electrical machines that he
then
gave (or, perhaps, sold) to the physics laboratory.
A move towards the new physics
(experimental
and up to date) came with the nomination of Father Giovan Battista (in
the
world Francesco Beccaria, 1716 - 1781) in 1748. The King (Carlo
Emanuele III)
who wanted to call the worthy Newtonian Jesuit Francesco Jacquier, let
himself
be convinced by Count Morozzo, reformer of studies, to sign the decree
nominating Father Beccaria, scholar of mathematics and physics in
addition to
being an erudite student of the works of scientists from Euclid to
Galileo and
Newton. A passionate character dedicated to the experimental sciences,
a
polemist indifferent to philosophical disputes but not to scientific
ones,
Beccaria declared himself a Galileian and Newtonian, and an upholder of
the
experimental method.
The science of mechanics was well
on the way
to formalization (which is completed half a century later by the
fundamental
work of Lagrange), or was committed to mathematical astronomy and
practical
applications. It was therefore natural for Father Beccaria, like many
others,
to show a great interest in the fascinating new electrical and chemical
phenomena. With this research he refounded the teaching of physics and
addressed his investigations to modern subjects. The level of his
researches
was comparable to that of the most active European centres. His
treatise
``About Artificial and Natural Electricism Books Two'' was published in
1753.
Accepting Franklin's theory of a single fluid, he arranged
systematically in
that framework the phenomena observed and introduced quantitative
mathematical
methods. His was, at that period, the best treatise on electrology that
contains its main subjects: the classification of electrical bodies,
the
function of the dielectric medium, the condensers, and the magnetic
properties
of bodies. He invented and used that which later will be called
Faraday's cage,
stating a fundamental property of electrostatics: ``all electricity
goes up to
the free surface of the bodies without diffusing in their interior
substance''.
He discussed, amongst other things, the electricity of clouds and in
general
the connection of electricity with atmospheric phenomena, and studied
the
dispersal of electrical charges in the air. Thus he diffused the use of
lightning conductors that therefore have been adopted in Italy before
elsewhere. Beccaria was a leading physicist well known internationally,
greatly
appreciated by Franklin and Priestley among others.
Beccaria admitted to his
experimentations
three cultured young gentlemen dedicated to the new experimental
science. These
were Count Giuseppe Saluzzo di Monesiglio (born 1734), Gianfrancesco
Cigna
(born the same year), and Giuseppe Luigi Lagrange, born two years
later. They
attended the laboratory sessions and participated in experiments. In
1757 the
three gentlemen founded the scientific society that became transformed
into the
Reale Accademia delle Scienze in 1783 by Royal Charter.
Between this group and Father
Beccaria,
however, a bitter contest opened regarding the interpretation of the
calcination of metals (Beccaria's interpretation was correct: he held,
on the
basis of very precise measurements, that the metal, once calcinated,
weighed
more, thus concluding that it had absorbed something from the air). The
atmosphere between the professor on one hand and the three young men on
the
other was thus damaged.
Later Lagrange followed, with much
greater
skill, the main roads of analytical mechanics rather than the paths of
Eighteenth Century chemistry, leaving Turin, in 1767, for Berlin, the
guest of
Frederic the Great for 20 years. Cigna was, above all, a very well
known doctor
(so much so that Beccaria called him to his death bed), even if he
continued to
dedicate time to the study of physics. Count di Monesiglio was the
first
President of the Royal Academy.
The determination of the arc of
meridian
between Andrate and Mondovì was due to Father Beccaria, assisted by
Father Canonica (who succeeded him in teaching from 1781 to 1788). The
topographic
base for the measurement was the straight line between the present day
Piazza
Statuto in Turin and Rivoli (as a plaque on the Piazza reminds today's
bypassers). They obtained for the arc the value of 1° 7' 44''. In
Paris,
Cesare Cassini, whose estimate, based on the average ellipsoid, was of
1°
8' 14'', criticized this result. The discrepancy between Beccaria's
measurement
and the theoretical computation was later correctly attributed (by
Plana,
around 1820) to the presence of the Alps, the attraction of which
deviates the
direction of the plumb line. Thus there was a good reason for the
measurement
by Beccaria to differ from the theoretical value.
The school of physics was continued
after
1788 by Abbot Giuseppe Antonio Eandi (1735 - 1799), deputy for Beccaria
and
professor of Geometry before assuming the responsibility for physics
and its
laboratory. His interests concerned medicine, technical arts and
chemistry. He
carried out research on air combustion, artificial and animal
electricity. His
treatise, ``Physicae Experimentalis Lineamenta ad Subalpinos'', written
in
collaboration with his nephew Antonio Maria Vassalli (1761 - 1825) was
widely
circulated in Italy and abroad. This same nephew, who succeeded him and
assumed
his surname (Vassalli Eandi), pursued, with competence and passion,
investigations on various aspects of electrology. He also devoted
himself to
the problems of the determination of units and the use of the decimal
metric
system.
Times changed and
became
difficult for the absolute States: the University was closed by order
of
Vittorio Amedeo III on November 2nd 1792. Reopened by order of the
Civil Government
on December 15, 1798, it expanded in the successive reorganization
(except
during the short Austro Russian occupation in 1799) by the creation of
new
chairs and schools, and by the exceptional assignment (decree of
December 1st
1800) of property formerly belonging to the suppressed ecclesiastical
body.
If, under the Emperor Napoleon, the
number of
the special schools was raised to nine, and if the disciplines and
teaching
were minutely regulated, on the other hand the financial provisions
were halved,
and with the decree of May 10 1806 the University, its autonomy lost,
came to
depend on Paris directly. In this framework 1810 saw the birth of the
faculty
of Sciences with nine chairs (Physics, Chemistry, Mineralogy, Zoology,
Comparative Anatomy, Transcendental Mathematics, Mechanics, Hydrology
and
Astronomy). In this period Vassalli Eandi was called to Paris as a
member of
the Commission of Weights and Measures.
In 1814 the restoration of the
Ancient
Régime brought back the organization to before 1792. Vassalli Eandi
(Life Secretary of the Accademia Reale delle Scienze) retired in 1822
and in
his place we find Father Giorgio Follini until 1826. In spite of the
restoration however, the storm had not passed in vain: those were
exciting
years for the experimental sciences and for mathematics, and the
scientific
milieu of the University of Turin was at a very high level.
Giovanni Plana (1781 - 1864),
astronomer and
mathematical physicist, merits to be cited in detail. Coming from
Voghera, he
was educated at the Ecole Centrale of Grenoble (together with Stendhal)
because, ironically, he was placed in the care of an aunt who lived
there, so
that he, fifteen year old, could be kept at a distance (in that remote
province
of the Kingdom of Sardinia) from the Jacobine ideas circulating in the
schools
of Voghera. Winner -- eighth out of 100 participants -- in the Lyon
competition
to enter the Ecole Polytechnique, where he had as teachers Lagrange and
Monge,
he was nominated Professor of Astronomy in our university in 1811 and
two years
later director of the observatory installed on the roof of the building
of the
Reale Accademia delle Scienze. With the restoration of the King, the
chair (a
Napoleonic creation) was suppressed, Plana became professor of Analysis
and
also had the chair of Rational Mechanics at the Military Academy (where
he was
later appointed Director of Mathematical Studies). Famous and
unanimously
appreciated for his activity in mathematical physics, Plana passed
unharmed
through the vicissitudes of 1821 and subsequent events. Appreciated by
the
King, he succeeded in arranging conveniently the observatory, placing
it on top
of one of the ancient towers of Palazzo Madama, a position then advised
for
research -- it was only in 1911, after the increased pollution by
electrical
illumination, that the observatory was moved to nearby Pino).
An important achievement was the
determination -- carried out under his direction by a commission of
Sardinian
and Austrian officers -- of the average arc of meridian between the
Equator and
the Pole, through a series of accurate measurements, both astronomical
and
topographical. As one of the results, these measurements connected the
French
network to the Austrian. This activity won him an important Austrian
decoration.
The work, of imposing size, that
made him
famous in his time, is the theory of the movement of the moon. His
tables,
unlike previous ones, did not need continuous experimental control and
adjustment, and surpassed Laplace's treatment of 1802 (in the treatise
Mécanique Celéste) thus winning the prize instituted -- on the
suggestion of Laplace himself -- by the Académie de France.
Amedeo Avogadro (1776 - 1856), an
exceptional
figure in chemistry and physics, took a degree in law but was
profoundly interested
in mathematics and the structure of matter. Starting in November 1809
he taught
at the secondary high school in Vercelli, having already written some
papers on
electrology and chemistry (on the nature of metallic salts). During his
period
in Vercelli he published two memoirs (1811 and 1813) in which he
formulated his
famous hypothesis on the composition of matter.
In 1811 he wrote: ``We must thus
conclude
that there is also a very simple relationship between the volume of
gaseous
substances and the number of simple or composite molecules that form
them. The
hypothesis which is presented the first in this respect, and here seems
the
only admissible one, is to suppose that the number of whole molecules
in
whatever gases is always the same in equal volumes, and is always
proportional
to the volumes'' (Essai d'une manière de déterminer les masses
relatives des molécules élémentaires des corps, Journal de
Physique, 73 (1811) p. 58 [my translation, VdA]).
This hypothesis of his took time to
be
accepted but today one of the fundamental constants of physics bears
his name.
His activity was manifested in many
scientific publications, most of which deal with subjects of molecular
physical
chemistry. This science, together with cristallography, was brilliantly
systemized
in the treatise ( 3700 pages) "Physics of Heavy Bodies" (Turin, Royal
Printers, 4 vol. 1837 - 1841).
The chair of Fisica Sublime (the
first in
Italy) was created and entrusted to Avogadro in October 1820. This
teaching
dealt with the mathematical principles of the natural sciences (from
1860
onwards it bore the name of Fisica Superiore that it still has today).
The
teaching, however, was suppressed by the decree 24.7.1822. In vain the
personal
report by his superiors stated: "Amedeo Avogardo, esq., professor of
Sublime Physics. Political situation: nothing to report. Reputation
adequate.
While we cannot state that Mr Avogadro is overwhelmingly attached to
His
Majesty, in the upheavals of these times he behaved without reproach".
Possibly Avogadro did not show enough zeal in blaming and repressing
the
restless students in 1821. He was given a small pension by the
University (600
Lire a year) and in 1824 was nominated Chief Auditor in the Royal
Accounts
Office.
New years of
troubles for the
Ancient Régimes opened with the events of July 1830 in France. Our
University closed between 1830 and 1832. The teaching of Fisica Sublime
started
again with the arrival of the great Cauchy who, loyal to the Bourbons,
after
the change of regime in France accepted the chair in Turin with a
salary
substantially reduced with respect to that in Paris. When Cauchy left
for
Prague to become tutor to the young Bourbon Pretender, Avogadro
returned in a
rather unofficial way to the teaching of Fisica Sublime with the royal
command
of 28.11.1934 ``for the provisional post until further orders from
Us''. The
General Calender for the Royal States, published yearly by order of the
King by
the secretariat of State, for the following years indicates ``unknown''
for
that chair, held by Avogadro until 1850 (the Calendar, renamed in 1850
General
Calendar of the Kingdom, associated again a name with the chair in 1854
when it
was entrusted provisionally to Felice Chiò, a pupil of Avogadro who
became the official holder the following year.
The chair of General and
Experimental Physics
-- the holder of which was also director of the scientific laboratory
-- was
from the time of the restoration in the ``Class'' of Philosophy; only
from 1849
onwards we find the ``Class'' of Physical and Mathematical Sciences. In
1828 it
was assigned to Giuseppe Domenico Botto (1791 - 1865) who had studied,
first in
Genova and then at the Ecole Polytechnique. An architect, captain of
the
Engineers, he had, in some way, participated in the riots in
Alessandria in
March 1821 for which he was forced to leave the army ``dismissed
without
permission to wear the uniform''.
Nominated professor of physics by
the King in
1828, the decree was suspended until a very rapid ministerial enquiry
(from
June 5th to 9th) checked his involvement in the affairs of 1821. The
minister
Barbaroux, on 21st, communicated to the Secretary of State that ``His
Majesty,
having remained quite satisfied by the explanations transmitted by his
Excellency the Marchese Brignole, on account of Architect Botto,
ordered me to
write to Your Honour to forward permission for his chair of
experimental
physics''.
Botto's experimental activity was
dedicated
to the important theories of the period: magnetic, thermal and chemical
effects
of electrical currents and induction of currents. In August 1830, in a
note, he
describes a prototype of electric motor with which he was
experimenting. In
1836 a more detailed Memoria to the Academy appears. It described a
``locomotive machine put into movement by electro magnetism, based upon
rotational motion''. In the following years he wrote a series of works
on the
energetic balance of electromagnetic circuits, addressed to improve the
efficiency and increase the power of electric engines. His last work,
in 1849,
proposed a new system of codification and transmission for the electric
telegraph (created in his university laboratory).
Botto also carried out, as might be
expected,
a notable work of spreading scientific culture with conferences and
popular
publications, not only in physics. There is an interesting ``Agrologic
Creed,
that is Principles of Science applied to Agriculture'', Turin, Royal
Printers
1846, important for promoting the techniques suited to improve
agriculture in
Piedmont. Botto's rich personal library, given to the University,
constituted
the first nucleus of the Physics Library as a separate entity in the
Institute
of Physics. With Botto therefore the level of the research in physics
at our
University remained high.
Silvestro Gherardi (1802 - 1879),
from
Romagna, is another example of that generation of scientists directly
involved
in the political renewal. He participated in the events of 1848 - 49
and was
Minister of Education in the brief period of the Roman Republic. Having
taken
refuge in the Kingdom of Sardinia, he had, from 1857 to 1861, the chair
of
physics in Turin, and thus the responsibility of the scientific
laboratory.
(After the unification of Italy he was a representative for Romagna in
the
first Italian Parliament.) Expert in electricity amd optics, he was
involved in
the history of science and (among other things) we owe to him the
conservation
of the texts of the disputation between Tartaglia and Ferrari (1547) on
the
solution of cubic algebraic equations. Naturally his involvement with
Turin was
too brief. He was followed, between 1862 and 1878, by Gilberto Govi
(1826 -
1889), from Mantua, veteran of the campains of '48 -49 and exiled in
France,
where he studied physics. In addition to studies and measurements on
various
subjects, Govi also spent time on the history of science; he edited
Ptolemaus'
Optics and published studies on Leonardo and Galileo. From 1872 onwards
he was
almost always in Paris, a member of the international commission for
weights
and measures, and became the first director of the International Bureau
of
Weights and Measures.
Through the
events of
1859-60, '66 and '70 Italy became a unified country. Apart from a few
exceptions, however, between the second half of the century and the
years of
the ``renaissance'' of physics in Italy (after 1920) the limited number
(and
concentration) of scientists, the absence of a national centre able to
promote
and coordinate the activities, and the scarcity of means and
laboratories with
which to face the most advanced problems, began to be felt. Fewer
physicists
are at an international level. Advanced mathematics, on the other hand,
was
dedicated to the development of new fields, fascinating but very
distant from
physics, or to a deeper study of the classical problems of mathematical
physics. Physics in Turin accentuated its eclectic and excessively
empirical
character, undervaluing theoretical prospectives, losing touch with the
great
themes of electromagnetic radiation, thermodynamics and statistical
mechanics,
structure of matter and the new born atomism, of which Avogadro was one
of the
founders.
Although not a professor at the
University
(but a member of the Collegio associated to the faculty), it is
necessary to
remember the activity of Galileo Ferraris (1847 - 1894). He was an
engineer,
professor of technical physics at the Royal Industrial Museum that was
later
annexed to the Politechnical School. He is famous for having planned
and
created electric motors working with alternate currents. He was a
person of
great honesty and extreme altruism: he did not want to take out a
patent on his
inventions and refused a large sum from an American company, because he
felt
that the discovery should be put at the service of everyone: ``I am a
professor, not an industrialist'', he said with regard to the offer. It
was a
constatation, not an act of pride.
Under Andrea Nàccari (1841 - 1926,
chair of General and Experimental Physics from 1878 - 1916) the new
Institute
of Corso D'Azeglio was inaugurated (November 1898). It was financed,
together
with other institutes of the Valentino area, by an organization in
which the
University, Government, Province and Town Council participated. In
reality the
Institute, the construction of which began in 1886, was already
finished in
1893 but for four years there was no money to furnish it. Compare this
with the
new wing of via Giuria, which took from 1969 to 1986 to be built.
The research carried out under his
supervision regarded thermology, chemical physics, electrostatics,
thermoelectricity,
conduction in gases and photoelectricity. We should note a series of
experiments about screening gravity, carried out with a torsion
balance, not
able, naturally, to detect any positive effect; and also the attempts
to reveal
the existence of ether (in contrast to Einstein's theory of
Relativity),
inspired by his colleagues Tommaso Boggio (in Turin) and Quirino
Majorana (in
Bologna, not to be confused with Ettore Majorana). Alfredo Pochettino
(1876 -
1953, chair from 1916 to 1946) who succeeded him, did not participate
in the
renewal of physics; he continued research on various aspects of
classical
physics: electricity, properties of the atmosphere (with ascents in
balloons)
and properties of solids.
The great season
of renewal
draws near however. Enrico Persico (1900 - 1969), coming from the Roman
school,
a great expert in quantum mechanics, holds the chair of Theoretical
Physics
from 1930 to 1947 (when he goes back to Rome) teaching quantum
mechanics and
mathematical physics. In spite of those difficult years, he prepared a
group of
young physicists, with work the fruits of which will be gathered after
the war.
Romolo Deaglio (1899 - 1978) holds
the chair
of Fisica Superiore from 1942 to 1969. An expert in precision
measurements, he
establishes the department of photometrics in the Istituto Nazionale
Galileo
Ferraris, organizing the work with new methods and equipment. After
1947 he
dedicated himself to the Physics Institute with energy, unselfishness,
and
organizational capacity. He selected, with competence and insight,
colleagues
and young scientists to found the new activity of the Institute:
nuclear and particle
physics. With a sense of institution and farsightedness he called, in
November
1949, Gleb Wataghin (1899 - 1986) to the chair of General and
Experimental
Physics; then the directing team of the Institute was completed by
calling, in
1950, Mario Verde (1920 - 1983), very young winner of a chair in
theoretical
physics.
Verde was a brilliant theoretician
coming
from the Scuola Normale di Pisa and the Physics Institute in Rome, with
behind
him a stay at Heisenberg's institute in Germany and a long period of
research
at the E.T.H. in Zurich with Pauli, Jost and Fierz and no previous
connection
to Turin. Wataghin, on the contrary, was by then well known in the
scientific
community of Turin, where he had arrived, a lonely refugee, in 1919; he
had
taken his degrees in Turin, Physics in 1922 and Mathemathics in 1924,
in spite
of immense material difficulties. For a long time professor at the
Royal
Military Academy in Turin, he was, between 1920 and '30, the only
physicist in
Turin who supported the new quantum physics (it was he who advised Gian
Carlo
Wick to choose the subject of his thesis and was his tutor for its
preparation). Extremely versatile, capable of working in theoretical as
well as
experimental physics, in 1934 he moved to Brazil where he is today
considered
one of the founding fathers of Brazilian physics. He also had to his
credit
both many expeditions for measuring cosmic rays in remote mountain
sites and an
immense enthusiasm for physics.
From then onwards a season of
striking
successes opens for the Institute bringing it up to the level of the
best
foreign and Italian institutions. Around the organizational ability of
Deaglio,
the drive of Wataghin's personality, and the profound mathematical and
theoretical culture of Verde, in the '50s a generation of enthusiastic
young
scientists start their activity. They take part in avant - garde
research,
travel and stay abroad for long periods. The pattern could not be more
different from the gloomy and difficult war period and from pre - war
physics in
Turin.
In a few years the contributions of
the
Institute of Turin become well known internationally. A group is formed
that
participates in the European collaboration for the launching of
balloons that
take into the upper atmosphere emulsions capable of detecting new
particles.
Launching balloons, and recovering them in the Mediterranean or in
western
Europe (sometimes in Yugoslavia) in those years where a passport was
needeed to
cross even the French frontier, sounds, and was, adventurous. Back in
the Institute,
the laboratory, prepared to analyse the emulsions, is ready. With the
arrival
of the new generation of particle accelerators, at the end of the '50s,
the
techniques change and the group organizes itself for the analysis of
traces in
bubble chambers. Other experimental groups study the detection of
cosmic rays
through counters (home made). Thus the Laboratory of Plateau Rosa, next
to the
Matterhorn, is reactivated. This site is a place of collaboration of
people
coming from various universities, with legendary accounts of endurance
by
physicists, going there for a week and staying isolated for a month,
desperate
for cigarettes and looking for butts under the rough wooden floor (they
could
do without food, but not without cigarettes...). Thus the laboratory of
electronics is developed. Other experiments take place in the
Institute:
nuclear reactions, electron scattering, and important experiments on
the
positron (Sergio Debenedetti, from Pittsburgh, on a sabbatic back in
his home
town). In 1954 the first Italian circular accelerator, a 30 MeV
betatron, soon
followed by a 100 MeV synchrotron, is mounted in the basement under the
garden.
Later, in 1960, an electrostatic accelerator of 250 KeV is planned and
built;
through the reaction (d, t) it produces 14.2 MeV neutrons. Experiments
in the
field of nuclear physics are performed with the particles and photons
produced.
At the same time theoretical
physics, that
already in the early '50s had reached results of great value (particle
and
nuclear physics, mathematical methods, field theory, general relativity
etc),
develops rapidly, thanks to the new generation of physicists. Two
Heinemann
prizes from the American Physical Society (1964 and 1968) and an
Einstein prize
in 1979 attest to the high level of the theoretical activity.
By the middle of the '50s the
integration of
the research in nuclear and particle physics in the international
community is
completed. The school of physics of Turin is one of the leading
institutions in
Italy. Many foreign colleagues work, sometimes for long periods, in the
Institute of via Giuria. Towards the end of the '40s there is a great
interest
in the long visit (one month) of the Nobel laureate P.A.M. Dirac. He
was also
remembered, years later, for his very long walks at great speed up and
down the
hills, followed by a couple of young theoreticians who tried (in vain,
so it
seems) to extract from him precious information about what to do. In
the '50s
the visit and presence of leading physicists and young ones destined to
an important
future is a normal event.
In 1957 the visit of the Nobel
laureate
Hideki Yukawa with his wife in kimono, traditional head dress, and
wooden
shoes, made a sensation. Physicists also remember the characteristic
figure of
Pauli in his last years, and Heisenberg, Thirring, Jost, Powell, Fierz,
Gell-Mann, T.D. Lee, Maurice Levy, Victor Weisskopf, Infeld, and many
other
nowadays well known physicists: American, French, British, German, and
from
many other countries too. Naturally our Institute, thanks to the origin
and
connections of Gleb Wataghin, is the first to establish contact with
the
physicists of Eastern Europe at the first sign of the thaw after '55:
Iwanenko,
Bogolubov, Alikhanian, Khalatnikov and many others. Several Italians
from other
Universities spend long periods in Turin and vice versa, a sign of an
internal
mobility that (regrettably)is no longer necessary, as communication is
today
immensely easier.
The foundation, in 1951, of the
INFN
(National Institute for Nuclear Physics), of which Turin is the first
section
(followed within a few months by Rome, Milan and Bologna) constitutes
an
example of a perfect organization of science at a national level, thus
favouring the cooperation between the different institutes, the choice
and
development of activities, and the diffusion of ideas and techniques.
Above all
the INFN supports research and expansion of collaboration in Italy and
abroad,
whilst the number of researchers directly dependent on the INFN always
remains
limited.
As a consequence, both the
theoretical and
the experimental collaborations increase. The experiments in particle
physics
that use accelerators are transformed into great international
collaborations.
The personnel of the Institute increases. If, at the end of the war,
the Institute
consisted of 6 - 7 persons between chairs and assistants, at the
beginning of
the '60s it reaches about 40 researchers with the corresponding
services needed
for a modern laboratory: mechanical electronic and printing workshops,
with a
sizeable number of technicians. In 1961 a floor is added to the
building of
'98, respecting its lines.
Physicists are eager for calculus.
There is
progress (from the mechanical calculating machines): the first Marchant
electric machines are bought soon by Mario Verde and the first Olivetti
electronic computer (Elea, fed by paper strip) arrives in 1960, soon
followed
by IBM computers. In 1968 a veritable computer centre is organized
around a
powerful IBM 360/44. It is the centre that later becomes the University
computer
centre and is at the basis of the creation of the CSI. At the same
time,
principally through Deaglio and Verde, a degree course in Informatics
is
created that rapidly assumes its own physionomy and structure. In 1985,
thanks
to the INFN, the Institute, endowed with powerful and versatile
computers at
various levels, forms the national INFN network. From this time onwards
the
Italian physics institutes are linked with other laboratories abroad by
the
international computer network, a tremendous improvement of efficiency
for
scientific cooperations.
Already from the first years of the
'60s, no
chance is lost to widen research with new chairs. If, for example, the
presence
of two chairs of theoretical physics is in those years still
exceptional in
Italian faculties, at Turin in 1961 there are already three. Many
physicists
from Turin have occupied chairs in other parts of Italy (Rome, Genoa,
Padua,
Cagliari, Catania, Modena, Florence, Bari). New professors come from
other
Italian institutes (Rome, Pisa, Milan...), amongst these Carlo
Franzinetti
(1923 - 1980) who gives great impulse to experimental particle physics
and
starts new fields of interest (but, unfortunately, he has no time to
pursue his
work for long). The research personnel continues to increase in the
following
years (in 1993, between the University, INFN and CNR there are about
200
people).
In the '60s a group in cosmic
physics,
geophysics and environmental physics is formed. This gives life to the
Institute of Cosmogeophysics of the CNR.
From the '70s onwards, various
groups are
present in every field of particle and nuclear physics, both
theoretical and
experimental. Subjects of research and collaborations expand. Groups
from Turin
participate in experiments at all major European, American, Soviet and
Japanese
laboratories , such as Frascati, CERN, SLAC, Fermilab, Brookhaven,
Saclay and
Orsay, Protvino and Dubna, DESY etc. Their theoretical colleagues
maintain a
close network of international collaboration and connections. In
addition,
foreseeing, with great anticipation, the developments of one of the
most
interesting themes of contemporary physics, the underground
experimentation to
detect the instability of the proton and perform neutrino physics is
promoted
with the creation of a pioneering laboratory under the Mont Blanc
tunnel.
The results reached by physics in
our
University, in all the fields in which there has been activity since
the
beginning of the '50s onwards, have been fundamental. Furthermore, the
development which has been traced here is not, as some might think,
just of a
technical character. Physics is particularly suited for promoting a
sort of
scientific humanism. These physicists of the post-war period are part
of an
international cultural community in which they are immersed, of which
they
share both the scientific values and the cultural interests: these
values and
interests allow them to establish bridges between different cultures,
contributing to create a climate of international collaboration and
reciprocal
understanding, and attitudes of tolerance and commitment for a better
world.
This atmosphere in turn influences the Turinese and Italian culture
through the
thousands of students that have participated, through the years, in the
endeavours of physics and thus in this atmosphere of scientific
renaissance
permeated by values of universal culture.
It is a pleasure
to thank Dr
Michele Ceriana Mayneri, whose help has been indispensable for the
reconstruction of the history of physics in our University. I am very
grateful
to Prof. Joan Franzinetti Rees for her invaluable help in drafting the
English
version of this article.
In the latter section of this
paper, the term
``Institute'' was used to mean the building and its content, in people
as well
as equipment, not in the legal university sense. At the start of the
'60s the
building hosted three legally defined ``institutes'': General, Superior
and
Theoretical Physics.
This paper was written in 1993.
Among its
criteria, there was the rule not to mention any living person.